[questions/qa-when-lang-neg] Possible typos

[xfq]

https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-when-lang-neg.en.html

Suppose Sylvia visits www.example.be and gets Flemish (situation 2 or 3). She then clicks on the German control and reads on, no real trouble. But she then clicks on a link to get to an interesting page within the site. Oops, Flemish again! Fortunately, the German control is still there, but after a couple of such detours she's getting understandably frustrated. Can't www.example.be just remember that she can't read Flemish? What is needed here is some stickyness of the explicit language selection.

"stickyness" should probably be "stickiness".

Note however than some measure of cultural adaptation (e.g. changing the currency) does not necessarily make pages non-equivalent

"Note however than" should probably be "Note however that".

[JohnTitor]

Agree, submitted #392 to fix them.

[r12a]

Whlie i agree that the dictionary form of the word is (nearly always) 'stickiness', i never changed it before because i quite like 'stickyness' in that it makes more obvious the relationship of the word to 'sticky'. If it's felt that we must change it, that's ok, but i'm much less inclined to change the id of the navigation section – otherwise it can break links into the document.

[JohnTitor]

I don't have a strong preference but if we prefer "stickyness", i.e. a word outside of the dictionary, it'd be great if we have a policy and document it somewhere, so that editors aren't confused and we can avoid the use of various spellings. In light of that, I think preferring dictionary spelling would be a simple way here.
But I totally agree about the ID, dropped the related change from #392.

[r12a]

I'd certainly rather just adopt the dictionary spelling if the alternative involves all those other things.