Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boten marks lack wide support #173

Open
r12a opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Boten marks lack wide support #173

r12a opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
doc:jlreq Used for gap analysis (only) to indicate target document. gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:text_decoration Other inline features l:ja Japanese p:ok s:jpan Japanese script x:clreq x:jpan

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Feb 3, 2020

This issue is applicable to Japanese & Chinese, in particular.

Chinese and Japanese have a native way of indicating emphasis for short ranges of inline text which involves placing a small mark above or below the characters being emphasised in horizontal text, and to the right/left in vertical text.

The actual marks used vary, depending on author preference, although some marks are more common in vertical text and others in horizontal. Typically, dots, circles, or 'sesame seed' shapes are used.

The following illustrates this:
Slide0210-3107917968

More:

css-text-decor CSS has several properties for displaying emphasis marks, and colouring them, positioning them, etc.

The GAP

The tests below check for support of the most common shapes, and that the positioning can be managed. When this gap was initially raised, Chrome (and legacy Edge) did not support display of emphasis marks, but now all major browsers support them.

Tests & results:

i18n test suite, CSS3 Text decoration, emphasis marks

Action taken

Document the layout requirements for Chinese and Japanese.

Outcomes

Boten marks are now supported in all 3 major engines: Gecko, Blink, and Webkit.

@r12a r12a added gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. doc:jlreq Used for gap analysis (only) to indicate target document. p:advanced Used for gap analysis issues (only) to indicate priority. i:text_decoration Other inline features labels Feb 3, 2020
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Feb 3, 2020

The first comment in this issue contains text that will automatically appear in one or more gap-analysis documents as a subsection with the same title as this issue. Any edits made to that comment will be immediately available in the Editor's draft of the document. Proposals for changes or discussion of the content can be made by adding comments below this point.

Relevant gap analysis documents include:
ChineseJapanese

@r12a r12a added the x:jpan label May 18, 2021
@r12a r12a added doc:clreq p:ok and removed p:advanced Used for gap analysis issues (only) to indicate priority. labels Sep 2, 2022
@r12a r12a added x:clreq and removed doc:clreq labels Sep 7, 2022
@r12a r12a closed this as completed Apr 26, 2023
@r12a r12a reopened this Apr 26, 2023
@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Oct 13, 2023

Added links to clreq and jlreq.

@r12a r12a added s:jpan Japanese script l:ja Japanese labels Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc:jlreq Used for gap analysis (only) to indicate target document. gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:text_decoration Other inline features l:ja Japanese p:ok s:jpan Japanese script x:clreq x:jpan
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants