Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build JL-TF charter for next period from 2023/Jan/01 #344

Closed
himorin opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #345
Closed

build JL-TF charter for next period from 2023/Jan/01 #344

himorin opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #345
Assignees

Comments

@himorin
Copy link
Contributor

himorin commented Nov 8, 2022

Our current running charter ends by 2022/Dec/31, and we have significant updates on our working area, such as jlreq-d. So, we need to update it and recharter.

Possible additions and modifications

  • add jlreq-d
  • mark as jlreq just for errata, and moving a11y improvements into jlreq-d
  • add ruby-t2s-reqs -> @murata2makoto ?
  • merge teleconference and video conference in usual meeting schedule? (right above section 1)
  • update section numbers of the Process Document?
  • add a line of license applicable for deliverables?
@kidayasuo
Copy link
Contributor

kidayasuo commented Nov 8, 2022

Thank you @himorin for the heads up. All proposals sound good. I will send the note to the list to solicit feedback.

• mark as jlreq just for errata, and moving a11y improvements into jlreq-d

How do we add the mark? I would appreciate it if you could do the mass move of a11y issues.

There might be other gh issues that should be moved over to jlreq-d. I can't spend much time rght now until spring but let's plan reviewing all remaining issues in jlreq.

• add a line of license applicable for deliverables?

Could you do this change?

thanks.

@himorin
Copy link
Contributor Author

himorin commented Nov 9, 2022

• mark as jlreq just for errata, and moving a11y improvements into jlreq-d

How do we add the mark? I would appreciate it if you could do the mass move of a11y issues.

ah, it's for charter, so just stating that was what in my mind.

There might be other gh issues that should be moved over to jlreq-d. I can't spend much time rght now until spring but let's plan reviewing all remaining issues in jlreq.

Yes, and also we can transfer issues from here to jlreq-d repository.
Let me take some time to develop 'future' related issues.

• add a line of license applicable for deliverables?

Could you do this change?

will raise a PR covering all points shortly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants