Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Lax” IRIs #14

Closed
gkellogg opened this issue Jun 30, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

"Lax” IRIs #14

gkellogg opened this issue Jun 30, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
propose closing spec:wontfix

Comments

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

gkellogg commented Jun 30, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Allows arbitrary strings to be used as IRIs

Original issue: "Lax" IRIs #590
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member Author

originally added to appease a potential adopter, but a bad idea IMHO

@gkellogg gkellogg mentioned this issue Jun 30, 2018
Closed
@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member

Also, it's also essentially already covered (conceptually) by the options for minting one's own IRI's. The content proposed in the original issue would simply become an ad-hoc URN of some kind. So, I don't believe there's anything here that's actually "fixable" because it isn't actually broken. 😃

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jul 2, 2018

Agree closing

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor

+1 to closing.

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor

Closing wontfix. Rationale: Isn't part of the RDF data model, and does not add value.

WG Resolution: https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2018/2018-07-27-json-ld#section2-2

@iherman iherman mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
propose closing spec:wontfix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@BigBlueHat @gkellogg @iherman @azaroth42