Fix typos in "Privacy consideration: start_url tracking"

[valioDOTch]

No description provided.

[RobDolinMS]

LGTM

[RobDolinMS]

@valioDOTch Would you please take care of the IPR issue?

[anssiko]

Marked as non-substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

[valioDOTch]

What exactly is IPR? Urban dictionary doesn't provide suitable semantics for this abbreviation

[kenchris]

IP review, I believe

[valioDOTch]

IP Review? I don't think this is covered by any sane legal regulation on immaterial goods.
In case it is, I will license these as CC-0 or whatever...

[kenchris]

I believe that is why Anssi marked it as non-substantive

[RobDolinMS]

Thanks @valioDOTch and @anssiko. It looks like this has passed all checks.

@kenchris or @anssiko would you want to click to [Merge pull request] ?

[anssiko]

Thanks!

[valioDOTch]

Now I get the IPR part; I was a bit tired yesterday.
Mea culpa ;-)

[marcoscaceres]

@valioDOTch, thanks for your contribution!

All,
For future reference, IPR means Intellectual Property Rights. As stated in the CONTRIBUTING.md,:

To make substantive contributions to specifications, you must either participate in the relevant W3C Working Group or make a non-member patent licensing commitment.

Which means either signing a digital agreement or getting contacted by the W3C patent lawyer, to sign away any IPR claims over the contribution.

Having said that, it is the Editors that have to determine if a contribution is "substantive" or not (not the person sending the pull request) - and mark it as non-substantive, as @anssiko did via the W3C IPR bot.