Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/mediacapture #1003

Closed
hober opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/mediacapture #1003

hober opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@hober
Copy link
Member

hober commented May 17, 2024

No description provided.

@jan-ivar
Copy link
Member

jan-ivar commented May 17, 2024

That sounds appealing. I assume we have a way of doing so without breaking old links?

I do notice that for https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc the TR version is named https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc

So that might be another option. I wonder why we didn't do that there. @dontcallmedom do you know?

@dontcallmedom-bot
Copy link

This issue had an associated resolution in WebRTC Interim, May 21st – 21 May 2024 (Issue 1003: repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/mediacapture):

RESOLUTION: Mediacapture-streams will be renamed to Mediacapture

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

the reason the shortnames aren't aligned is historical; that being said, the cost of renaming the repo isn't trivial since it requires creating redirects, updating a number of other projects (browser-specs, wpt, mdn bcd, …) - I'm not convinced this is worth doing at this point.

@eladalon1983
Copy link
Member

I'm not convinced this is worth doing at this point.

I'd also not have suggested this because I think it's more work than it's worth. But if the people who suggested this renaming are motivated enough...

Maybe the inverse is easier? Maybe you could create https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture and have it redirect to https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main? (Just a thought.)

@alvestrand
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW, Google search for link:https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main claims that there are around 5.740 links around the Web to the github.io version of the spec.
And another 7.570 linking to link:https://github.com/webrtc/mediacapture-main

So the redirects will have to stay around forever.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

given the expected cost/benefits ratio, we're no longer proposing to proceed with this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants