Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

Clarify most accessibility information gets lost #42

Closed
chaals opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #43
Closed

Clarify most accessibility information gets lost #42

chaals opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #43
Assignees
@chaals
Labels
Accessibility Editorial

Comments

@chaals
Copy link
Collaborator

chaals commented May 24, 2017

See also #4

Clarify that as it stands, microdata loses accessibility information like alt attributes, aria annotations, etc., and that if people need to preserve this they should consider RDFa with its greater expressivity, or use the markup really explicitly.
@chaals chaals self-assigned this May 24, 2017
chaals pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 24, 2017
update "horizontal considerations sections"
a8c9097 
fix #42, #36
See also #4

Add an accessibility considerations section, flesh out a bit of i18n (basically, microdata isn't that good at it, you might want RDFa), clarify privacy and security sections a bit.
@chaals chaals mentioned this issue May 24, 2017
Merged
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@chaals chaals

Labels
Accessibility Editorial
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

update "horizontal considerations sections" w3c/microdata
1 participant
@chaals