You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
MusicXML 3.x's <attributes> element allows (at least in terms of its schema) many kinds of part changes to occur in the middle of a measure. Some of these are solidly idiomatic CWMN changes, for example mid-measure clef changes. Others, it could be argued, do not make sense. For example, mid-measure time signature changes would seem to erode the very concept of "measure". Mid-measure transposition changes feel confusing at the very least (compared to having a different part with its own distinct transposition enter the score at a measure boundary).
Not arguing for a particular outcome here, but this feels like an area that could use clarification in CWMNX.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agreed, mid-measure time-signature changes should be prohibited even if some obscure counter-example can be found in literature (there's always an example). A class of measure attributes that can only change at the measure boundary is a good concept to have.
MusicXML 3.x's
<attributes>
element allows (at least in terms of its schema) many kinds of part changes to occur in the middle of a measure. Some of these are solidly idiomatic CWMN changes, for example mid-measure clef changes. Others, it could be argued, do not make sense. For example, mid-measure time signature changes would seem to erode the very concept of "measure". Mid-measure transposition changes feel confusing at the very least (compared to having a different part with its own distinct transposition enter the score at a measure boundary).Not arguing for a particular outcome here, but this feels like an area that could use clarification in CWMNX.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: