Is status information important in the response for a payer-initiated credit transfer?

[ianbjacobs]

Is status information important in the response for a payer-initiated credit transfer?

[mattsaxon]

I believe it is. As a minimum, the app would like to know if the payment is Pending or Complete.

[ianbjacobs]

From 20 June call, @vkuntz and Kris agree.
(Vincent: Technical validation: "received" all the way up to "settled")

[ianbjacobs]

Added statusInformation in:
#70

[CYV]

If it is so important (I beleive it is !) why not putting this field as required ?

[mattsaxon]

+1

[ianbjacobs]

I have removed "optional" from the spec.
Do we need to say more about what response values can appear in this field?

[mattsaxon]

We need to provide a canonicalisation I think. I suggest something like; "Authorised", "Accepted", "Processed", "Cleared", "Settled".... @vkuntz , does ISO have a suggested category list for this?