Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potentially revisit oneRealm #387

Closed
annevk opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #397
Closed

Potentially revisit oneRealm #387

annevk opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #397
Assignees

Comments

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Oct 20, 2022

I could find some discussion at #151 (comment), but is this really something that is needed? And is "one realm" the correct term? I could imagine a browser storing a grant for a browsing session (i.e., a tab), but not a single realm.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

marcoscaceres commented Oct 28, 2022

We can actually test this now as we have multiple (3) implementations. I'll check.... maybe the whole realm thing can go away from the spec.

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres self-assigned this Oct 28, 2022
@johannhof
Copy link
Member

+1 to that, if I understand correctly neither Firefox nor Chromium support the realm concept at all. Chromium definitely doesn't support the oneRealm parameter (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=977612) and it's unlikely it ever will.

@miketaylr
Copy link
Member

maybe the whole realm thing can go away from the spec.

SGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants