editorial: swapped violation/infringement #274

w3c · Oct 25, 2017 · 1fd3fac · 1fd3fac
1 parent f4ff940
commit 1fd3fac
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/model/index.html b/model/index.html
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ <h3>Consequence property with a Permission/Obligation Duty</h3>
 <section id="duty-prohib">
 <h3>Remedy property with a Prohibition</h3>
 
-<p>The <code>remedy</code> property expresses an agreed Duty that MUST be fulfilled in case that a Prohibition has been <strong>infringed</strong> by being exercised. If the Prohibition action is exercised, then all remedy Duties MUST be <strong>fulfilled</strong> to address the violation of the Prohibition. The <code>remedy</code> property is a sub-property of the <code><em>failure</em></code> property.</p>
+<p>The <code>remedy</code> property expresses an agreed Duty that MUST be fulfilled in case that a Prohibition has been <strong>infringed</strong> by being exercised. If the Prohibition action is exercised, then all remedy Duties MUST be <strong>fulfilled</strong> to address the infringement of the Prohibition and set it to the state <strong>not infringed</strong>. The <code>remedy</code> property is a sub-property of the <code><em>failure</em></code> property.</p>
 
 	<p>A remedy MUST NOT refer to a Duty that includes a consequence Duty.</p>