Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #262 from w3c/pub-request-draft
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Updated the CR Transition admin files, publication requests are ready…
  • Loading branch information
iherman committed Sep 18, 2017
2 parents f4889c1 + b99825d commit 4656b1e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 117 additions and 0 deletions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions admin/CRTransitionAdmin/CRTransitionRequest.md
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
* Process document's relevant URL: https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#last-call
* Transition requirements: https://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions?profile=CR&cr=new
* Mail to be sent to: ralph@w3.org, plh@w3.org, cc to timbl@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, team-poe-chairs@w3.org

Request sent on Sept 14: ttps://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2017JulSep/0150.html


---

Philippe, Ralph,
Expand Down
31 changes: 31 additions & 0 deletions admin/CRTransitionAdmin/PreliminaryPublicationRequest.md
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
To be sent as soon as the documents pass pubrules

----

Denis,

this is just a preliminary publication request. The POE Working Group has requested a CR transition for two documents[1], to be published on the Tuesday, 26 of September. The two documents are:

ODRL Information Model
ODRL Vocabulary & Expression

The two document snapshots are already available

https://w3c.github.io/poe/snapshots/CR-odrl-model-20170926/
https://w3c.github.io/poe/snapshots/CR-odrl-vocab-20170926/

And I will put them on the /TR/2017/ as soon as we have the Director's decision.

Both documents go through pubrule's checker. The Link checker reports three errors for the second document, namely broken links (with possibly broken fragments) for:

http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns

but these are the usual problems with namespace documents that do not have an HTML representation. I have checked the fragments manually and they are all fine.

Thank you!

Ivan

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2017JulSep/0150.html
82 changes: 82 additions & 0 deletions admin/CRTransitionAdmin/PublicationRequest.md
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
To be sent to the webmaster, comm team, coralie, xueyuan, WG chairs on Friday the 22nd, once the DD is available.

----


(Coralie, Xueyuan, this is for information only; I will send you the HPN and AC mail drafts at the time of the publication)

Denis,

This is an official publication request for the publication of two ODRL Documents as Candidate Recommendations. The publication date is the 26 of September, 2017. The transition request for CR has been issued in:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2017JulSep/0150.html

the Director's approval is in:

@@@@@@


The documents are as follows
----------------------------

ODRL Information Model
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-odrl-model-20170926/

ODRL Vocabulary & Expression
http://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-odrl-vocab-20170926/

Abstract and Status Sections
----------------------------

See the previous URL-s

The documents are already in place and pass the pubrules' checker.

The link checker has a few of problems with the ODRL Vocabulary & Expression. These are due to the fact that three URL-s refer to namespaces that do not have an HTML representations. I have checked the reported broken fragments, and they are all fine. The three URL-s are:

http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns


Thanks!

Ivan











Denis,

this is just a preliminary publication request. The POE Working Group has requested a CR transition for two documents[1], to be published on the Tuesday, 26 of September. The two documents are:

ODRL Information Model
ODRL Vocabulary & Expression

The two document snapshots are already available

https://w3c.github.io/poe/snapshots/CR-odrl-model-20170926/
https://w3c.github.io/poe/snapshots/CR-odrl-vocab-20170926/

And I will put them on the /TR/2017/ as soon as we have the Director's decision.

Both documents go through pubrule's checker. The Link checker reports three errors for the second document, namely broken links (with possibly broken fragments) for:

http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns

but these are the usual problems with namespace documents that do not have an HTML representation. I have checked the fragments manually and they are all fine.

Thank you!

Ivan

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2017JulSep/0150.html

0 comments on commit 4656b1e

Please sign in to comment.