Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Range of RightOperand #208

Closed
riannella opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Range of RightOperand #208

riannella opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@riannella
Copy link
Contributor

Clarify range of rightOperand

@riannella riannella added the Model label Jul 4, 2017
@riannella riannella added this to Under Current Discussion in ODRL Deliverables Review Jul 4, 2017
@riannella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Proposal: update rightOperand property to have "literal or IRI" as the value.

Update range as union of rdfs:Literal and rdfs:Resource ???

@simonstey
Copy link
Contributor

Update range as union of rdfs:Literal and rdfs:Resource ???

that would be redundant ->
https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_resource:

All things described by RDF are called resources, and are instances of the class rdfs:Resource. This is the class of everything.

https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_literal:

rdfs:Literal is an instance of rdfs:Class. rdfs:Literal is a subclass of rdfs:Resource.

@riannella
Copy link
Contributor Author

So the better option is ?? ;-)

@simonstey
Copy link
Contributor

don't define an rdfs:range at all

riannella added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2017
@riannella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated with "literal or IRI"

commit: 8b13e42

@riannella riannella moved this from Under Current Discussion to Proposed Solution in ODRL Deliverables Review Jul 7, 2017
@riannella riannella moved this from Proposed Solution to Completed (Last Call) in ODRL Deliverables Review Jul 14, 2017
@riannella riannella removed this from Completed (Last Call) in ODRL Deliverables Review Aug 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants