Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing type of a Constraint's unit property #230

Closed
nitmws opened this issue Sep 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Missing type of a Constraint's unit property #230

nitmws opened this issue Sep 1, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@nitmws
Copy link
Contributor

nitmws commented Sep 1, 2017

In the IM 2.5.1 Constraint Class its property unit is defined this way:

A Constraint may have none or one unit property value for the unit value of the rightOperand/Reference.

But this definition misses the type of the property values.
I suggest:

  • strict variant (as in ODRL 2.1): IRI (to refer to a Concept representing the unit)
  • lax variant: IRI or literal value.

AND: I feel the the definition above is not clear; what is a property "for the unit value of the rightOperand/Reference."?
I suggest:
A Constraint may have none or one unit property value (of type ....) to set the unit used for the value of the rightOperand/Reference.

@nitmws nitmws assigned nitmws, sereAbi and riannella and unassigned nitmws Sep 1, 2017
@riannella riannella added this to Under Current Discussion in ODRL Deliverables Review Sep 1, 2017
riannella added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2017
@riannella
Copy link
Contributor

Done

@riannella riannella moved this from Under Current Discussion to Proposed Solution in ODRL Deliverables Review Sep 1, 2017
@riannella riannella moved this from Proposed Solution to Completed (Last Call) in ODRL Deliverables Review Sep 9, 2017
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Sep 11, 2017

Can this issue be closed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
ODRL Deliverables Review
Completed (Last Call)
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants