-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Renaming properties #89
Comments
The current practice is to only "fix" those terms that have the "same" URI (except) for the capital letter (such as /Permission and /permission) - and the change is to add "Has..." to the label for the properties - the purpose is to meet I18N requirements for different (label) languages. We want to avoid changing URIs unless its something is broken ;-) |
I have effected this changes in the TTL file. In particular, the following properties have been renamed. The definition of permission, prohibition, action, constraint, duty and operator has actually been left, but marked as "deprecated" and pointing to the new term. Other references in the document have been updated. |
@vroddon This was not what the WG agreed to. The agreed to only change the label to "Has..." not the URI. We did not want to deprecate a term that is not broken (by changing its URI). |
@riannella Done. Changes have been reverted as they were before my commit.
Víctor
El 22/01/2017 12:39, Renato Iannella escribió:
…
@vroddon <https://github.com/vroddon> This was *not* what the WG
agreed to. The agreed to only change the *label* to "Has..." not the
URI. We did not want to deprecate a term that is not broken (by
changing its URI).
Can you please reverse this change?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#89 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFLs5bjnMDMyTjBk2vwqdJnMNUjM7VeGks5rUz_6gaJpZM4LnA8A>.
--
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 91336 3672
Skype: vroddon3
---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
Shall we adopt the recommendations to prefix a property with "has" or "is"?
http://wiki.opensemanticframework.org/index.php/Ontology_Best_Practices#Naming_and_Vocabulary_Best_Practices
We would have properties like "hasPermission" instead of "permission", "hasConflict" instead of "conflict" etc.
I see some consensus from the minutes at https://www.w3.org/2017/01/09-poe-minutes but this is an important change for which I would like to have confirmation. Shall I rename the properties?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: