Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing interface terms and reference to DOM standard added #321

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 1, 2016

Conversation

tidoust
Copy link
Member

@tidoust tidoust commented Jul 1, 2016

Preparing the document for publication as Candidate Recommendation, I noticed that the spec did not reference the DOM standard, whereas it uses some of its interfaces.

This update completes the list in the terminology with (base) IDL terms that the specification references such as EventTarget, EventHandler, etc.

Note it is strongly recommended to sort out the list of normative references before publication as Candidate Recommendation (any change to the list of normative references is by definition "normative", and normative changes to a Candidate Recommendation normally require another publication as Candidate Recommendation).

@anssiko or @mfoltzgoogle, could you review this as soon as possible and merge? Thanks!

This update completes the list in the terminology with (base) IDL terms that
the specification references such as EventTarget, EventHandler, etc.

This also means that the DOM standard now appears in the list of normative
references.
@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented Jul 1, 2016

LGTM. Thanks! Good to know that changes to references would require another CR publication.

@anssiko anssiko merged commit ab16bda into w3c:gh-pages Jul 1, 2016
@tidoust
Copy link
Member Author

tidoust commented Jul 1, 2016

Thanks! There's always room for interpretation. For instance, I expect we'll drop one of the references to HTML5/HTML5.1 at some point and that should not create any problem.

@mfoltzgoogle
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants