Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consolidate similar parts of REC revision #878

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented May 21, 2024

Revising a REC is a fairly complicated piece of the Process. The 4 subsections that deal with making revisions for class 1 through 4 are comparatively simple, but they had very strong similarities between class 1 and 2, and class 3 and 4. Consolidating the text not only makes the whole thing shorter, it also eliminates subtle differences of language that could leave people wondering about potential differences where none were intended or useful.

This PR is an alternative to #865. It merges the 4 subsections into 3 rather than into 2, to keep "new features" distinct, so as not to make reading about class 3 changes more complicated for those who don't care about class 4.

This is a small part in addressing #700


Preview | Diff

Revising a REC is a fairly complicated piece of the Process. The 4
subsections that deal with making revisions for class 1 through 4 are
comparatively simple, but they had very strong similarities between
class 1 and 2, and class 3 and 4. Consolidating the text not only makes
the whole thing shorter, it also eliminates subtle differences of
language that could leave people wondering about potential differences
where none were intended or useful.

This is a small part in addressing w3c#700
@frivoal frivoal added Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call Topic: Simplifications labels May 21, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels May 22, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024 milestone May 22, 2024
@frivoal frivoal force-pushed the refactor-rec-revision-alt branch from 4bf5398 to 5d569c1 Compare May 22, 2024 16:49
@frivoal frivoal merged commit 68c1bed into w3c:main May 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the refactor-rec-revision-alt branch May 22, 2024 16:51
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Editorial, delayed by holiday...

Comment on lines +4085 to +4089
For [=Recommendations=] explicitly identified as [=allow new features|allowing new features=],
tentative new features (see <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a>)
<em class=rfc2119>may</em> be annotated in as [=candidate additions=],
and <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a> may be normatively incorporated
as for <a href="#correction-classes">class 3 changes</a> in [[#revised-rec-substantive]].
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
For [=Recommendations=] explicitly identified as [=allow new features|allowing new features=],
tentative new features (see <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a>)
<em class=rfc2119>may</em> be annotated in as [=candidate additions=],
and <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a> may be normatively incorporated
as for <a href="#correction-classes">class 3 changes</a> in [[#revised-rec-substantive]].
For [=Recommendations=] explicitly identified as [=allow new features|allowing new features=],
tentative new features (see <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a>)
<em class=rfc2119>may</em> be annotated as [=candidate additions=],
and <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a> may be normatively incorporated
in the same fashion as <a href="#correction-classes">class 3 changes</a> in [[#revised-rec-substantive]].

@plehegar plehegar added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Jun 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Topic: Simplifications
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants