-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some respec issues #59
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great stuff, thanks Ross!
A related but non-blocking issue that we could take up in a separate PR, before we republish this: we should update the spec reference format recommended by @marcoscaceres in w3c/preload#104 (comment). @siusin @rmcilroy do either of you have a few cycles to tackle that? Once that's resolved, I think we're ready to ship. |
Regarding the spec reference format - is it only the references to other specs (i.e., those with [Foo] which are defined to links at the bottom of index.html) which need changing here, or is there anything else? |
Addressing comment on w3c#59
Addressing comment on w3c#59
Addressing comment on w3c#59
Addressing comment on w3c#59
Addressing comment on w3c#59
@igrigorik this fixes some respec issues in the spec. It is built upon the previous pull request, and I can't find a good way in GitHub to only show the difference between this PR and the base PR, but the actual change is the "Fix some respec issues" commit in this list (rmcilroy@674d7e9)