Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 19, 2018. It is now read-only.

Best Practice Summary function broken #43

Closed
philarcher opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Best Practice Summary function broken #43

philarcher opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@philarcher
Copy link

ReSpec includes (or used to include) a very useful function for Best Practices documents that auto-generated summary lists. Inserting <section id="bp-summary"> </section> used to work very nicely.

We use this in http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html and http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/ for example.

It ceased functioning with the new stylesheet and it would be really good to have it back, please?

@philarcher philarcher added the bug label Mar 2, 2016
@halindrome
Copy link
Contributor

Huh - I had no idea it had that feature. That's awesome. I will look into it.

@halindrome
Copy link
Contributor

That's not ReSpec. That's code in your source that builds the list up. Starts around line 44.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Should we consider adding this as a plugin?

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Mar 2016, at 1:38 AM, Shane McCarron notifications@github.com wrote:

That's not ReSpec. That's code in your source that builds the list up. Starts around line 44.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@halindrome
Copy link
Contributor

I have been thinking about it in general - things like lists of figures
etc. I think it is a reasonable feature to support.

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Marcos Caceres notifications@github.com
wrote:

Should we consider adding this as a plugin?

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Mar 2016, at 1:38 AM, Shane McCarron notifications@github.com
wrote:

That's not ReSpec. That's code in your source that builds the list up.
Starts around line 44.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#43 (comment).

Shane McCarron
halindrome@gmail.com

@philarcher
Copy link
Author

I am delighted to see that this has been fixed. Thank you very much, on behalf of the DWBP and SDW WG editors.

@halindrome
Copy link
Contributor

You are welcome. Note that I was completely unaware of the general feature that is built into ReSpec. Sad that the thing is so complex I don't know all of its features now!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants