We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When using markdown & is not protected in code sections (single or triple backticks)
&
The gfm spec documents that wihin code , & will not start an entity reference
code
https://github.github.com/gfm/#example-331
However this does not happen in respec markdown, at the top level you need & and in included markdown you need to double escape as &
&
&
URL to affected spec or repo:
test document (copy of markdown example from respec doc, plus → examples)
→
https://davidcarlisle.github.io/testdoc/respec-markdown
This actually came up in a potential W3C Math WG note while I was experimenting with using markdown source, see
https://w3c.github.io/mathml-docs/notes-on-mathml/#a-first-example
where I have to double quote as ± to get ± to show.
±
±
What happened (e.g., it crashed)?:
bactick & rightarrow; backtick produces →
→
Expected behavior (e.g., it shouldn't crash):
expect bactick & rightarrow; backtick to produce →
Optional, steps to reproduce:
See above test document.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Description of problem
When using markdown
&
is not protected in code sections (single or triple backticks)The gfm spec documents that wihin
code
,&
will not start an entity referencehttps://github.github.com/gfm/#example-331
However this does not happen in respec markdown, at the top level you need
&
and in included markdown you need to double escape as&
URL to affected spec or repo:
test document (copy of markdown example from respec doc, plus
→
examples)https://davidcarlisle.github.io/testdoc/respec-markdown
This actually came up in a potential W3C Math WG note while I was experimenting with using markdown source, see
https://w3c.github.io/mathml-docs/notes-on-mathml/#a-first-example
where I have to double quote as
±
to get±
to show.What happened (e.g., it crashed)?:
bactick & rightarrow; backtick produces
→
Expected behavior (e.g., it shouldn't crash):
expect bactick & rightarrow; backtick to produce
→
Optional, steps to reproduce:
See above test document.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: