Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OMS mapping #116

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

OMS mapping #116

merged 20 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

dr-shorthair
Copy link
Collaborator

SOSA-OMS.ttl includes

  1. additional RDF properties and classes corresponding to classes and properties introduced in OMS where there isn't a clear mapping
  2. explicit ogc:implements links from each RDF resource to the corresponding requirement in OMS

Copy link
Contributor

@rob-metalinkage rob-metalinkage left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sosa.ttl is now a backwqards compatible profile of sosa-oms.ttl - this can be described formally using PROF in a separate graph.

sosa:observes ogc:implements <http://www.opengis.net/spec/om/3.0/req/obs-cpt/Observer/observableProperty-sem> ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf sosa:forProperty ;
owl:inverseOf sosa:isObservedBy ;
# schema:domainIncludes sosa:Observer ;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason this was removed from sosa.ttl but commented out in sosa-oms.ttl?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was waiting on the resolution of #29 and #43.
Now removed.

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair merged commit be17656 into gh-pages Nov 6, 2023
1 check passed
@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair deleted the OMS-mapping branch November 6, 2023 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants