Need to review best practices text to ensure that they consistently use an imperative style

[6a6d74]

In her email Kerry notes:

I like those worded in an imperative style like "xx should be yyy" , over those worded in the "how to" style. I think the latter kind should be rewritten to the former kind.
e.g. "How to describe relative positions" could be " Relative positions should be expressed in a machine-interpretable or human readable manner"

[lvdbrink]

Only one remaining is Best Practice 10: Encoding spatial data

[lvdbrink]

BP3: General linking > @6a6d74 to come up with a name

BP4: Use spatial data encodings that match your target audience > Suggested to @BillSwirrl

BP6: Multiple geometries > @andrea-perego to come up with a name

BP9: It's difficult to think of a good name... "Use relative positioning" (current name) sounds like you should always do relative positioning, which is not what we mean. My best attempt is "Use relative positioning for describing the position of spatial things relative to another" > @lieberjosh to come up with something

[lvdbrink]

BP3, BP4, BP6 are done.

BP9: open

"Best Practice 11: Describe properties that change over time" is also problematic. What about "Provide information on the life cycle of spatial things"?

[lvdbrink]

BP11 title will be "Provide information on the changing nature of spatial things"

BP9 title will remain as is.