Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Few Javanese fonts available, and they are problematic #37

Open
r12a opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Few Javanese fonts available, and they are problematic #37

r12a opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
doc:java gap i:fonts Fonts & font styles l:jv Javanese p:advanced s:java x:java

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Feb 4, 2020

There are only a handful of Javanese script fonts. (Google's original Javanese Noto font was disliked, but Google updated it.)

The most popular font appears to be Tuladha Jejeg, but that requires Graphite for rendering, so it only works properly on Firefox.
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Feb 4, 2020

The first comment in this issue contains text that will automatically appear in the Javanese gap-analysis document as a subsection with the same title as this issue. Any edits made to that comment will be immediately available in the document. Proposals for changes or discussion of the content can be made in comments below this point.

@r12a r12a added the x:java label May 11, 2021
@r12a r12a changed the title Few fonts available, and they are problematic Few Javanese fonts available, and they are problematic May 17, 2021
@r12a r12a added s:java l:jv Javanese labels Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
doc:java gap i:fonts Fonts & font styles l:jv Javanese p:advanced s:java x:java
Projects
Gap-analysis pipeline
Status: Issue identified, needing investigation
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@r12a