Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Introduction - acronyms should be written out before first use for comprehension #293

Closed
msellon opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Introduction - acronyms should be written out before first use for comprehension #293

msellon opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
migration: other Issues that do not fall into the other three categories section: Requirements Related to Silver Requirements document Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review

Comments

@msellon
Copy link

msellon commented Feb 23, 2021

UAAG 2.0 is used in the Introduction without further explanation, although other acronyms are being written out fully before shortened. This change then also changes the verb form from singular to plural.

UAAG 2.0 offers useful guidance to user agent developers and has been implemented on an individual success criterion basis.

Should be
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG) 2.0 offer useful guidance to user agent developers and have been implemented on an individual success criterion basis.
@lauracarlson lauracarlson added status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) labels Mar 5, 2021
@lauracarlson
Copy link

Thank you for your comment. Project members are working on your comment. You may see discussion in the comment thread and we may ask for additional information as we work on it. We will mark the official response when we are finished and close the issue.

@lauracarlson lauracarlson added section: other documents Not FPWD section: Requirements Related to Silver Requirements document and removed section: other documents Not FPWD labels Mar 5, 2021
jspellman added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2022
@jspellman
#293
1880f99
@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

PR #619. Also fixed the first use of WCAG 3.0 in the Abstract

@slauriat
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for comment! We've incorporated changes into pull request #619 to address.

@slauriat slauriat added survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review and removed status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal labels May 17, 2022
@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added the migration: other Issues that do not fall into the other three categories label Aug 29, 2023
@alastc
Copy link
Contributor

alastc commented Mar 21, 2024

Closed by #619

@alastc alastc closed this as completed Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
migration: other Issues that do not fall into the other three categories section: Requirements Related to Silver Requirements document Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@alastc @slauriat @lauracarlson @jspellman @rachaelbradley @msellon