Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display section status based on status-* classes #564

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

WilcoFiers
Copy link
Contributor

@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers commented Oct 22, 2021

This PR adds a function to the script which looks for status indicators on sections, and appends status information after the first heading in that section.

Please note: I've added status indicators into the document to demonstrate the functionality. These do not represent the status as agreed on by the group. I will leave it up to the chairs / editors of WCAG 3 to decide which section should have which status.

A preview of this can be seen here:
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/status-proposal/guidelines/index.html#normative-requirements

@michael-n-cooper
Copy link
Member

This is a more comprehensive implementation than I would have done. :) I was expecting status indicators to appear in the for the element, e.g., "Text Alternatives (Exploratory)". This will also cause the status to appear in the TOC. The status para underneath is good to keep as well. I also expected some kind of different styling for the sections, e.g., each status would have some kind of style differentiation in addition to the heading information. But that's a design question outside my area, and something we can improve later.

@WilcoFiers
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #577

@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers closed this Jan 20, 2022
@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers deleted the status-proposal branch January 20, 2022 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants