Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mensural dot #235

Open
rettinghaus opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Mensural dot #235

rettinghaus opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@rettinghaus
Copy link
Contributor

For common notation augmentationDot is available, for chant notation there is the mora glyph (chantAugmentum).

Dots in mensural notation however are not comparable with those because

  1. they can have different meanings (Punctus perfectionis, Punctus divisionis or Punctus additionis)
  2. they usually have a boxier, diamond-like shape:

image

It would be nice if this dot could be added at a separate code point (and not as an alternate of the former ones). I think it would fit nicely into the Medieval and Renaissance individual notes range, if we want to align this range with the individual notes from the common repertoire.

@rettinghaus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just for reference, I noticed that this is available in November music font (as augmentationDotDiamond).

@mscuthbert
Copy link

I'd be concerned about encoding the meaning of the dot in SMuFL (rather than MusicXML/MNX/etc.) there are so many cases where the dot could be one thing or another, so we'd end up with punctusProbablyDivisionisButPotentiallyAdditionis, etc. They are graphically identical to each other. There are fonts cases where someone might want to distinguish a modern augmentation dot from a medieval/Renaissance punctus graphically, (and also from chant) so I could be okay with adding one glyph/code-point for a mensural punctus separate from augmentation dot, but not multiple for different uses.

@rettinghaus
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wouldn't expect there to be half a dozen different glyphs, just one. I just wanted to point out that it does indeed have a different meaning than the available dots.

@dspreadbury dspreadbury self-assigned this Sep 13, 2022
@dspreadbury dspreadbury added this to the SMuFL 1.5 milestone Sep 13, 2022
@dspreadbury
Copy link
Contributor

@mscuthbert, would you prefer to find such a single-purpose mensural dot in the "...noteheads and stems" range, the "...individual notes" range, or the "...miscellany" range?

@mscuthbert
Copy link

I think best in "miscellany"

@rettinghaus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since the counterpart for common notation (augmentationDot) is in the "Individual Notes" range, I would still prefer the corresponding "...Individual Notes" range for consistency.

@dspreadbury
Copy link
Contributor

This glyph will be called mensuralPunctus and have code point U+EA11 in the Medieval and renaissance miscellany range.

dspreadbury pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants