The expressions and illustrations in the vector effects chapter of SVG 2 CR are broken.

[satakagi]

http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/coords.html#VectorEffects

However, they of working draft look normal.
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/coords.html#VectorEffects

The situation of the single page version is also the same.

[AmeliaBR]

Part of the problem is MathJax is not running. On Chrome, I'm getting "Uncaught ReferenceError: local is not defined at https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/style/load-mathjax.js:3:10." Firefox gives an equivalent error. If you look at the source code, the MathML is still there. But it's not displaying, not even in Firefox (which should have native MathML support).

The other problem is that the folder of supporting images (images/painting/vectorEffects/) doesn't seem to have been copied over to the TR/SVG2/ file tree.

@nikosandronikos I think you were tweaking some of the scripts with respect to MathJax last month. Was that with respect to the missing local variable? Do you or @shepazu know how to fix the missing image files?

[nikosandronikos]

Regarding the images, I can confirm that they were in the archive to be uploaded. So it's just an oversight that they are missing.
I don't have access, but @shepazu can hopefully add them from http://andronikos.id.au/svg2-august-cr/publish/images/painting/vectorEffects/
Since they should have been initially uploaded, I can't see any problem in just adding them now.

For the exception in load-mathjax.js, I hadn't done any work on that. But I can see the problem. local is defined in link-fixup.js. But that script is only included in Editors Drafts. So the fix is to check whether local is actually defined before trying to reference it. I've uploaded and verified a fix here. Perhaps @shepazu could copy that version over the one published with the SVG 2 CR?

[nikosandronikos]

Note today is a holiday in the US, so I'll set myself a reminder to ping @shepazu tomorrow or Monday.

[boggydigital]

Not blocking updated 2.0 CR publication - assigning 2.0 Recommendation milestone to clean this up before 2.0 REC

[svgeesus]

Both the math and the images are correct in the latest CR so closing this as fixed.

I didn't have to do anything special except to remember the image directory is three levels deep when CVS adding the fils.