New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
should responsive design be a requirement? #10
Comments
I vote 👍 on this! |
But keeping things simple isn't always enough. The two primary offenders are tables and pre blocks. Those tend to perform poorly at low widths. Ideally the styles should cater to that with proper overflowing and the such. |
I completely agree @darobin, I was just making a general (useless?) comment. |
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 07:43 -0700, Robin Berjon wrote:
Responsive design is a technique. The requirement would be, should the Making the specs mobile-friendly and epub-friendly might indeed
|
Yes. The page should work for all sized screens. No reason not to, imo. If you are wondering who would ever read a spec on their phone — well, I did just the other week. Sat at dinner and read one spec start to finish. I thought I'd printed it out and brought it with me, but I'd printed the wrong one. |
File separate issues if there's something specific that's broken. Responsive design in general is obviously a requirement: it's a fundamental principle of how the Web's layout systems are designed, and why the CSSWG spends so much of its time defining 'auto'. https://twitter.com/sgalineau/status/233244223837720576 |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: