You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I find the specification of the properties in §2.1 BitstringStatusListEntry very difficult to read, because it is not clear where, for example, the definition in the right column for id ends and type begins. Please use some visual clues (borders, background color, etc) to overcome this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have checked the html source, and I must admit I am a bit lost. The source uses the same class="simple" attribute for tables as, say, the VC JSON Schema document does, but the rendering is different. At first glance, I did not see any difference in the respec setup or the included files. I cannot explain what I see, but the editors may know this...
Older versions of ReSpec had a "simple" table class. That has been removed, for whatever reason. I added the missing CSS classes back in for simple tables to make it easier to read.
I find the specification of the properties in §2.1 BitstringStatusListEntry very difficult to read, because it is not clear where, for example, the definition in the right column for
id
ends andtype
begins. Please use some visual clues (borders, background color, etc) to overcome this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: