Apply WG consensus on confidenceMethod terminology.

Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>

index.html

@@ -3201,7 +3201,7 @@ <h3>Reserved Extension Points</h3>
 The following reserved properties are at risk and will be removed from the
 specification if at least one specification with two independent implementations
 are not demonstrated by the end of the Candidate Recommendation Phase:
-`confirmationMethod` / `confidenceMethod`, `presentationSchema`, and
+`confidenceMethod`, `presentationSchema`, and
 `renderMethod`.
         </p>
 
@@ -3215,16 +3215,13 @@ <h3>Reserved Extension Points</h3>
 
           <tbody>
             <tr>
-              <td>`confirmationMethod` / `confidenceMethod`</td>
+              <td>`confidenceMethod`</td>
               <td>
-A property used for specifying how a <a>verifier</a> can confirm, or
-gain more confidence in, the presentation of the credential being associated
-with a particular <a>subject</a>. The associated vocabulary URL MUST be
-`https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials#confirmationMethodORconfidenceMethod`.
-
-                <p class="issue" title="Bikeshedding confirmation/confidence">
-The name of this property is currently being debated by the Working Group.
-                </p>
+A property used for specifying how a <a>verifier</a> can gain more confidence
+in, the presentation of the credential being associated with a particular
+<a>subject</a>. The associated vocabulary URL MUST be
+`https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials#confidenceMethod`.
+
               </td>
             </tr>
             <tr>