You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The [=holder=] and [=verifier=] trust the [=issuer=] to issue
true (that is, not false) [=credentials=] about the [=subject=], and to
revoke them quickly when appropriate.
Truth (or falsity) is not part of our remit. It is entirely possible that a holder and/or verifier might trust that everything issued by a given issuer is false. All that a verifier can trust is that the issuer made the claims contained in a properly secured verifiable credential.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Brent Zundel: Ted, it's your issue, do you want to walk us through.
Ted Thibodeau Jr.: possibly just deleting that paragraph.
… the problem with "trust" at all is, it's outside the bounds of what we can really do.
… we're cryptographically assuring that contents are the statements of the issuer, that's it.
… there's nothing about the truth of them, or anything else.
… just "this issuer said these things at this time".
Ivan Herman: +1 to TallTed.
Ted Thibodeau Jr.: so talking about truth in the context of revocation doesn't make sense.
Dave Longley: +1 to TallTed.
Manu Sporny: +1 to that, Ted.
Dave Longley: +1 to just remove the paragraph.
Manu Sporny: I think we do have, in some other part of the spec, exactly what you said.
Dmitri Zagidulin: +1 to remove paragraph.
Manu Sporny: I think it is generally presumed that you're going to listen to the issuer, but of course there are cases where you might not trust em.
… or just a subset of what they're saying. I reacted strongly to "lets just delete it", but now that I'm reading it, if we have that language elsewhere,.
… do you want to take this issue?
Ted Thibodeau Jr.: yeah, I'll take it,.
Joe Andrieu: this is a really good catch, Ted. I agree we don't have to depend on the trust. might be useful to say something about trusting that the issuer is using the mechanism correctly.
Brent Zundel: sounds like we have a path forward, look forward to the PR.
Originally posted by @TallTed in #1469 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: