removes ToU from the main text while keeping it in the reserved extension points table #1294
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sion points table
Sakurann
requested review from
msporny,
OR13,
selfissued,
decentralgabe and
awoie
as code owners
decentralgabe
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2023
brentzundel
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2023
|
I suggest that this PR is closed due to #1295 |
RolandoMorales22
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2023
decentralgabe
added
the
DO NOT MERGE
|
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-10-17
View the transcript2.5. removes ToU from the main text while keeping it in the reserved extension points table (pr vc-data-model#1294)See github pull request vc-data-model#1294. Brent Zundel: The plan as we discussed last time, is to close 1294 assuming we get consensus and can merge 1295.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
addresses issue #1010 - there does not seem to be sufficient interest to better define Terms of Use property in the main text.
but keeping it in the reserved extension points table.
Preview | Diff