Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SAML/OIDC comparison by David Chadwick #74

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 6, 2017
Merged

Conversation

msporny
Copy link
Member

@msporny msporny commented Oct 16, 2017

Add a comparison between SAML and OpenID Connect done by @David-Chadwick.

comparison.html Outdated
</p>

<p>
The FIM trust model is wrong as it requires the Identity Provider (IdP)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's strike "is wrong as it". It's a subjective value judgment that detracts from the point.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Accepted

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

comparison.html Outdated
</section>

<section>
<h1>Comparison of Verificable Credentials with SAML and OIDC</h1>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small typo: "Verificable" -> "Verifiable"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@burnburn
Copy link
Contributor

As a novice to SAML and OIDC I would have no idea that this was a comparison since they are referenced but not mentioned by name. Rather, this reads to me like one of the most compact explanations of why we are doing the VC work that I have ever read. I was surprised to find it a separate doc and not part of our spec.

The text itself is wonderful and I am willing to accept it as-is to get something in place, but I do have the two concerns above.

@msporny msporny merged commit 8dc44bf into gh-pages Nov 6, 2017
@msporny msporny deleted the chadwick-saml-oidc branch November 30, 2017 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants