Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify language that warns of invalid examples #31

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2023

Conversation

seabass-labrax
Copy link
Contributor

@seabass-labrax seabass-labrax commented Aug 18, 2023

This commit contains a minor improvement to a paragraph early in the specification. See also w3c/vc-di-eddsa#59.


Preview | Diff

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@seabass-labrax
Copy link
Contributor Author

seabass-labrax commented Aug 21, 2023 via email

@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Aug 21, 2023

we use this invalid JSON in neither vc-di-eddsa nor vc-di-ecdsa currently

OH! Yes, we should only include the paragraph about invalid JSON in docs where we have such invalid JSON.

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Sep 2, 2023

Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.

@msporny msporny merged commit 75faa94 into w3c:main Sep 2, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants