Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

point to an ietf cose wg adopted draft for a COSE typ header #152

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 4 additions & 7 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -333,12 +333,10 @@ <h2>Securing JSON-LD VCs with COSE</h2>
with COSE.
</p>
<p>[[rfc9052]] MAY be used to secure this media type.</p>
<p>When using this approach, the <code>type (TBD)</code> SHOULD be
<code>vc+ld+json+cose</code>
</p>
<p class="issue">
See <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-cose-typ-header-parameter/">draft-jones-cose-typ-header-parameter</a>,
regarding progress towards explicit typing for COSE.
<p>When using this approach, the <code>typ</code> SHOULD be
<code>vc+ld+json+cose</code>.
See <a href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter-00.html/">I-D.ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter</a>
for the COSE "<code>typ</code>" (type) header parameter.
</p>
<p>When using this approach, the <code>content type (3)</code>
SHOULD be <code>application/vc+ld+json</code></p>
Expand All @@ -350,7 +348,6 @@ <h2>Securing JSON-LD VCs with COSE</h2>
Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags</a> for additional
details.</p>
</section>
<p class="issue" data-number="67"></p>
</section>
</section>
<section class="informative">
Expand Down