Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose Community Groups reports #87

Open
dontcallmedom opened this issue Dec 11, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Expose Community Groups reports #87

dontcallmedom opened this issue Dec 11, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

For a tool I'm building to keep track of CG activities and results, it would be useful to have a way to list draft and final reports published by Community Groups in the W3C API

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member

vivienlacourba commented Dec 11, 2018

@dontcallmedom, a few weeks ago we discussed with @jean-gui and @deniak about porting the CG code to Symfony and in particular what relates to the CG reports. Once done we will be able to expose it in the W3C API. But this had in our mind a low priority, we were still planning to do it in 2019 but without a more specific date.
Seeing that this is of interest to you, we might try to tackle this sooner.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member Author

no need to raise the priority from my perspective - it's a nice to have for my project, not a must.

(I thought it was just a matter of exposing it, I didn't remember it was built on a different code base)

@jyasskin
Copy link
Member

jyasskin commented May 4, 2021

I would also like to use the API to find CG reports, as described in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2021AprJun/0018.html.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member Author

@jyasskin while I'm supportive of the need, I don't think this particular request will fulfill your use case: only a very small number of CG reports are actually recorded as such at the moment. For instance, none of the many docs under development in WICG have been recorded: https://www.w3.org/community/wicg/#group-reports

I also don't think we record editors when CG reports are filed, since CG reports in general don't have the same parseability guarantees as TR specs.

I'll follow up on spec-prod with an alternative approach.

@jyasskin
Copy link
Member

jyasskin commented May 5, 2021

Thanks! I'm happy with your suggestion to use Reffy instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@jyasskin @dontcallmedom @vivienlacourba and others