Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Definition of obsolete #57

Closed
LJWatson opened this issue Jul 21, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Definition of obsolete #57

LJWatson opened this issue Jul 21, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs) Type: Editorial improvements
Milestone

Comments

@LJWatson
Copy link
Contributor

The first sentence of the definition of an obsolete specification is difficult to read:

"An Obsolete Recommendation is a specification that W3C does not believe has sufficient market relevance to continue recommending that the community implement it, but does not consider that there are fundamental problems that require the Recommendation be Rescinded.">

Could it be simplified? Perhaps:

"An obsolete Recommendation is a specification that the W3C believes no longer has enough market relevance to continue recommending it for implementation, but does not have fundamental problems that would require it to be rescinded.">

@jeffjaffe
Copy link

Also combine with Issue #36.

LJWatson added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2017
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs) labels Dec 9, 2018
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2018 milestone Feb 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs) Type: Editorial improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants