Tersify summary #74
Tersify summary #74
Conversation
I think the summary is to much describing what a business case is and benefits from cutting to the chase. I debated if the four areas of benefits should be linked, but then that would be even more redundant with the Page Contents block, so I didn’t do that. Signed-off-by: Eric Eggert <mail@yatil.net>
|
+1 for limiting the summary describing what a business case is. (I proposed this previously. :-) |
|
+1 to limit the summary on the business case. (I also made a related comment some time ago.) Rationale as above: I think the summary plus the first heading on essentially "what is a business case+why" takes away from the main interest of this very useful resource. |
|
It was editor's discretion and I am strongly opposed to removing this description because I think there are many who do not understand that a business case need not just say "you will make this much more money for this level of investment" but can also talk about cultural improvements and risk avoidance. Two people outside of EO who read this told me they had not thought previously about how risk analysis - the risk of inaction - was an important argument within the Biz case. |
I think the summary is to much describing what a business case is and benefits from cutting to the chase.
I debated if the four areas of benefits should be linked, but then that would be even more redundant with the Page Contents block, so I didn’t do that.