Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Responsible body #9

Closed
AndrewArch opened this issue Feb 2, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

Responsible body #9

AndrewArch opened this issue Feb 2, 2017 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@AndrewArch
Copy link
Collaborator

AndrewArch commented Feb 2, 2017

@maryjom suggests: Pick word applicable to that country. U.S. says “Agency”, other countries seem to say “Ministry”

@AndrewArch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In Australia we generally have Departments and Agencies, Eg Dept of Finance or Attorney-General’s Department and Digital Transformation Agency.

@bakkenb
Copy link

bakkenb commented Feb 8, 2017

Do we pick this word (wording) or do we just use the words that are input by the user? I am not sure what the question or issue is here. More explanation please.

@shawna-slh
Copy link
Contributor

I think we'll need multiple words to cover most cases.

@yatil
Copy link
Contributor

yatil commented Feb 10, 2017

Can’t we say something like “Issuer”? (Is a law issued? I have no idea…) For example:

  • Issuer: Dept of Finance
  • Issuer: Attorney-General’s Department and Digital Transformation Agency
  • Issuer: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales

As the type of Agency is in its name, this should be sufficient. In Germany, having “Ministry” and then “Arbeit und Soziales” would not work as there are federal (“Bundes“) and state (“Landes”) ministries. Having something more neutral might help.

@maryjom
Copy link
Collaborator

maryjom commented Mar 30, 2017

Some of these agencies are the issuer, some are responsible for enablement, and some are responsible for enforcement. e.g. for Section 508 in the U.S., the U.S. Access Board develops and issues the rule. GSA is responsible for ensuring or educating agencies use the Section 508 standard in procurement. Dept. of Justice gets involved with enforcement and development of settlement agreements when non-compliance issues are not resolved.

I think the best solution would be to have the choice in the submission form and have the correct term show up in the content as suggested by Shawn. Terms to include in the choices: Agency, Ministry, Department. Can you think of any others?

One last option is to possibly say "Responsible body" or "Responsible entity" as more generic terms. Question is whether that will be an understandable term that we get the correct information in submissions.

@shawna-slh
Copy link
Contributor

Is it important to distinguish between Agency, Ministry, or Department? Will people submitting information necessarily know which category is right for their information?

If not very important to distinguish, then I support a generic term. To make it understandable, we could do something like:

Responsible entities (Agency, Ministry, etc.)

@maryjom
Copy link
Collaborator

maryjom commented Mar 31, 2017

@slhenry I don't think it's important to distinguish, so actually would prefer to use something generic. It also means it's one less thing to have to put into the form and verify before posting an update.

maryjom added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2017
Fix for issue #9, don't show related docs if none
@iamjolly
Copy link
Contributor

This has been addressed in the latest pull request for the submission form PR88. Closing, but issue can be reopened if wording should be revisited.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants