Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Question regarding WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1, and WCAG 2 #569

Closed
nrhsinclair opened this issue Sep 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Question regarding WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1, and WCAG 2 #569

nrhsinclair opened this issue Sep 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@yatil @shawna-slh
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@nrhsinclair
Copy link

I find this labeling a bit confusing. WCAG 2 could cause confusion, looks as though 2.1 is not included in 2
@yatil
Copy link
Contributor

yatil commented Sep 13, 2018

@slhenry What do you think?

@shawna-slh
Copy link
Contributor

This is an open issue site-wide. Hopefully we'll get it addressed in Sept...

@yatil yatil mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2018
Closed
@yatil
Copy link
Contributor

yatil commented Oct 21, 2018

We will use “WCAG” (no version number) when it is insignificant if WCAG 2.0 or 2.1 is meant. (WCAG 1 is in the process of being marked obsolete.)

@yatil yatil closed this as completed in 6b3e673 Oct 21, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@yatil yatil

@shawna-slh shawna-slh

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@yatil @shawna-slh @nrhsinclair