New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2.4.7 Focus Visible - explanation/understanding addition about "mode of operation"? #301
Comments
Going through old issues, but I've been updating focus-visible so this is relevant. For HTML-based web content I've generally ignored this phrase, assuming the default 'mode of operation' is the only mode of operation. I was assuming it accounted for flash or something, where there might be multiple modes of operation? In the new draft, how about a line such as:
|
Context of this is question was also certain arguments for/against the use of |
in short, if the WG agrees with my above interpretation/assessment, i'd rather have the understanding doc explain this idea of "mode of operation" as in "a way in which the user controls/operates their UA / which input method they use", and perhaps a positive technique that shows the use of |
Huh, I hadn't come across that argument before. To me the key words in the SC are "keyboard focus indicator", not focus indicator or mouse-focus indicator. How about:
Or suggest something... |
the most recent one I can remember was here https://twitter.com/patrick_h_lauke/status/1048303192147152896 I'll ponder this / put it in my to-do list :) |
Well, that paragraph above is in the the focus-more-visible draft for WCAG 2.2. whether that replaces the current 2.4.7 or is as well-as depends on the discussion on the list at the moment. |
yeah sorry, wasn't meaning that your suggested text was insufficient or anything. just not had time to fully review that whole hornets' nest. may end up with more like a positive technique that shows it's kosher to use |
Noting that the above text in the understanding doc for 2.4.7 now: Can we close this one? A PR for a new technique would be separate anyway... |
Yup, all good to close this. If I get a chance/remember, I'll do a tiny positive technique using |
Re-opening as it was missed by the group when included in the focus-visible enhanced PR. |
I'd want us to be careful with a sufficient technique using :focus-visible. We should consider a matching failure technique where the designated values (outline, background) by the author cause the focus visibility to fail. BTW, Mozilla has a nice page showing some of the different pseudo-classes. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:focus-visible |
In the call we settled on this text:
I'll add it to the focus-visible branch. |
Added in this update, so closing. |
* Updates to the SC text and ripple effects. * Criterion typo * Updated SC in understanding, minor 2.4.7 update * Updates from issue 1055 * Aligned the 'at least' phrases in the SC text. * Update bsaed on 1064 * Updated mode of operation Based on #301 * Adding to the size metric and updating 1st line * Updated understanding to match SC text * Changes from the meeting https://www.w3.org/2020/06/30-ag-minutes.html#item02 * Adding 'discernable' https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/focus-visible-enh-issues3/results#xq4 * Adding fstorr's updates I needed to set this up to merge with the feature branch (rather than master) and my git-fu was no enough, so re-creating. * Renaming focus-vis-eng to focus-appearance-minumum * renaming the focus-appearance understanding doc * Adding Focus Appearance (Enhanced) * Adding technique for focus-appearance-enh * Added AAA to the new stuff section. * mbgowers update * SC updates from #1212 * Removing failures from focus-vis #1067 Co-authored-by: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Two years late, but: here's the technique I intended to write for #301 (comment)
The current wording of the SC
talks about a "mode of operation". However, the understanding document https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-focus-visible.html currently doesn't mention/explain this at all. What exactly is meant by "a mode of operation"? A user setting? Does the act of using a keyboard itself constitute a "mode of operation"? It would be good to get at least a mention of this in understanding.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: