-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
People are confused by "future link" references in techniques #91
Comments
How would the group feel about moving all "future link" references to a wiki page and removing them from the How To Meet document? |
The point of the "future link" was to indicate techniques at least by On 29/05/2015 2:48 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
|
Yes in 6 years we've never developed one AAA future link. It might be a good idea to to a garage cleaning on them to see which are still useful and do what you say Michael retitle them "other potentially useful approaches" |
There are 251 references with "future link" in them. Some of them seem to be more "best practices" than techniques. The difference is that techniques are really specific things one does to satisfy a SC; best practices are general design ideas to keep in mind to enhance accessibility and usability but aren't the sort of thing it's useful to see on a checklist or that always relate to a specific SC. A problem with this may be that best practices are not in scope of the WCAG WG. Many "advisory techniques" sections would be completely empty if we removed the "future link" techniques. Some do seem like techniques that would be useful as such. Some are proposed advisory techniques because they're not sufficient in and of themselves. Others because they go above and beyond what is required to be sufficient. Yet in both cases they're useful. I don't believe this is either editorial or ready to survey, so removing those tags. I think the right action might be to go through all 251 of these and categorize them as:
When Advisory Techniques sections are left empty after taking these actions, remove them. I can take a pass at proposing this categorization. But it will take a while to do it for 251 techniques. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: