New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update contrast-minimum.html #2034
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -13,15 +13,14 @@ <h1>Understanding Contrast (Minimum)</h1> | |
<h2>Intent of Contrast (Minimum)</h2> | ||
|
||
|
||
<p>The intent of this Success Criterion is to provide enough contrast between text and | ||
its background so that it can be read by people with moderately low vision (who do | ||
not use contrast-enhancing assistive technology). For people without color deficiencies, | ||
hue and saturation have minimal or no effect on legibility as assessed by reading | ||
performance (Knoblauch et al., 1991). Color deficiencies can affect luminance contrast | ||
somewhat. Therefore, in the recommendation, the contrast is calculated in such a way | ||
that color is not a key factor so that people who have a color vision deficit will | ||
also have adequate contrast between the text and the background. | ||
</p> | ||
<p>The intent of this Success Criterion is to provide enough contrast between text and its background so that it can be read by people with moderately low vision. | ||
This user group does not typically use contrast-enhancing assistive technology. | ||
For people without color deficiencies, hue and saturation have minimal or no effect on legibility as assessed by reading performance (Knoblauch et al., 1991). | ||
Color deficiencies can affect luminance contrast somewhat. | ||
Therefore the contrast is calculated in such a way that color (hue) is not a key factor. | ||
People who have a color vision deficit (often referred to as "color blindness") will also have adequate contrast between the text and the background.</p> | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. maybe add a "do" to make it a bit clearer ("For people without color deficiencies ... People who do have a color vision deficit..." "will also have adequate contrast between the text and the background." maybe at the end, add - to make it a more complete sentence - "if the requirements of this Success Criterion are followed", as currently it's left a bit hanging... There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Agree that this needs improvement. |
||
<p>The contrast ratio thresholds address the needs of people with the four types of red-green color blindness (deuteranomaly, protanomaly, protanopia, and deuteranopia) and the two types of blue-yellow color blindness (tritanomaly and tritanopia). Monochromacy is also addressed.</p> | ||
<p>While end-user needs are the primary consideration behind the contrast ratios used, a ratio of 4.5:1 provides content authors a wide range of color options for foreground and background colors. A contrast ratio of 4.5:1 also allows content authors some limited options for three colors that each contrast with each other. (For example, a web page could use use a middle gray background color while featuring white and black body text.)</p> | ||
|
||
<p>Text that is decorative and conveys no information is excluded. For example, if random | ||
words are used to create a background and the words could be rearranged or substituted | ||
|
@@ -361,9 +360,11 @@ <h2>Resources for Contrast (Minimum)</h2> | |
</li> | ||
|
||
<li> | ||
|
||
<a href="https://www.loc.gov/nlsold/reference/guides/largeprint.html">National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (NLS), The Library of Congress Guidelines for Large Print</a> | ||
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<a href="https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-conditions-and-diseases/color-blindness/types-color-blindness">Types of Color Blindness, National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)</a> | ||
</li> | ||
|
||
</ul> | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
reads a bit odd/informal with the "somewhat" at the end. Maybe "Color deficiencies can have a slight impact on the perception of luminance contrast"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree about the "somewhat" at the end. How about using parallel of previous sentence? So instead of:
We would have:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel the impact of luminance difference is on all people and not specific to color vision deficiencies. To the contrary, people with color vision impairments often have a very big luminance sensitivity.
How do you like the following:
The intent of this Success Criterion is to provide enough contrast between text and its background so that it can be read by people with moderately low vision.
This user group does not typically use contrast-enhancing assistive technology.
For many people, luminance contrast has a significant impact on legibility.
For people without color deficiencies, hue and saturation have minimal or no effect on legibility as assessed by reading performance (Knoblauch et al., 1991).
Yet color deficiencies can also affect luminance contrast.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @gundulaniemann
As far as reading and readability is concerned, it's all about luminance contrast, for all sighted users.
The visual word form area (VWFA) is the pre-lexical processing that recognizes whole words in the letter pears, and it functions on the luminance channel exclusively without consideration of color as a hue or colorfulness. MRI studies using the Stroop test confirm this (as does the Stroop test itself for that matter).
All vision types require ample luminance contrast for best readability. By "ample" I mean what Ian Bailey/Jan Lovi-Kitchin call the "contrast reserve", for best fluent readability, they suggest 20 times the threshold (JND).
Yes, the deutan/protan/tritan forms of color vision deficiency (CVD) have as good or better contrast sensitivity as standard vision. The exception is protan and red/orange against black.
I am going to respond to this more in depth in the later post.