Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.4.11 Non-text Contrast understanding: expand explanation for Figure 10 #2681

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 27, 2024

Conversation

patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

Provides some actual context about why the green border doesn't need to contrast with the button itself, and moves the easily missed extra prose that follows into the actual figure caption (as it's currently easy to miss when skimming over the document)

Provides some actual context about *why* the green border doesn't need to contrast with the button itself, and moves the easily missed extra prose that follows into the actual figure caption (as it's currently easy to miss when skimming over the document)
@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member Author

This could be backported to 2.1 as well (removing the link to the focus appearance SC)

@mbgower
Copy link
Contributor

mbgower commented Feb 1, 2024

Might be an idea to generate a preview copy so folks can easily review in context -- even a screen shot of the pertinent paragraphs in your local build would be useful to some for context.

@detlevhfischer
Copy link
Contributor

detlevhfischer commented Feb 2, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@bruce-usab bruce-usab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good with or without the "AAA" I ask about adding into line 121.

@mbgower mbgower merged commit 2aee9c9 into main Feb 27, 2024
1 check passed
@mbgower mbgower deleted the patrickhlauke-non-text-contrast-understanding-tweak branch February 27, 2024 15:48
@iadawn iadawn restored the patrickhlauke-non-text-contrast-understanding-tweak branch March 7, 2024 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants