Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove custom decision policy #3242

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: charter-2022
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Remove custom decision policy #3242

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
711e46e
Remove custom decision policy
Jun 14, 2023
9026b9c
test fix to tabs
rachaelbradley Jun 14, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions charter.html
View file
Open in desktop
Expand Up @@ -12,38 +12,38 @@
max-width: 60em;
margin: 0 auto;
}

ul#navbar
{
font-size: small;
}

dt.spec
{
font-weight: bold;
}

dt.spec new
{
background: yellow;
}

ul.out-of-scope > li
{
font-weight: bold;
}

ul.out-of-scope > li > ul > li
{
font-weight: normal;
}

.issue
{
background: cornsilk;
font-style: italic;
}

.todo
{
color: #900;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -420,8 +420,8 @@ <h2> Communication </h2>
<h2> Decision Policy </h2>
<p>This group will seek to make decisions through consensus and due process, per the <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#Consensus"> W3C Process Document (Section 5.2.1, Consensus</a>). Typically, an editor or other participant makes an initial proposal, which is then refined in discussion with members of the group and other reviewers, and consensus emerges with little formal voting being required.</p>
<p>However, if a decision is necessary for timely progress and consensus is not achieved after careful consideration of the range of views presented, the Chairs may call for a group vote and record a decision along with any objections. </p>
<p>The Working Group maintains specific procedures to establish and measure consensus and address objections in the <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/decision-policy">AG Working Group Decision Policy</a>.</p>
<p class="todo">Note: The AG WG has maintained a supplemental decision policy to support the review needed for decisions that can impact regulatory content. A recent update preserves this for stable content while reducing procedural requirements for content that is still under development. The scope of this charter combines <em>maintenance of the mature WCAG 2.x</em> with <em>innovation of WCAG 3</em>. Because of this complex scope, the WG chairs view the decision policy changes as essential to WG success. The updated decision policy should be reviewed together with this draft charter.</p>
<p>To afford asynchronous decisions and organizational deliberation, any resolution (including publication decisions) taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference will be considered provisional. A call for consensus (CfC) will be issued for all resolutions (for example, via email, GitHub issue or web-based survey), with a response period from 5 to 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation of the group consensus on the issue. If no objections are raised by the end of the response period, the resolution will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the Working Group.</p>
<p>All decisions made by the group should be considered resolved unless and until new information becomes available or unless reopened at the discretion of the Chairs or the Director.</p>
<p>This charter is written in accordance with the <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#Votes">W3C Process Document (Section 5.2.3, Deciding by Vote)</a> and includes no voting procedures beyond what the Process Document requires. </p>
</section>
<section id="patentpolicy">
Expand Down