New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update PDF techniques #3354
Update PDF techniques #3354
Conversation
- none of the images had `alt` text; all were relying on the `figcaption` element to describe them. I fixed this. - removed 404ing resources and updated others to https. - removed multiple links with no text in them. - removed an example using Word 2003. There is a Word 2007 example remaining.
Adobe’s Livecycle product doesn’t exist any more and had its last stable release 10 years ago. I removed content relating to that.
Also fixed badly-formed lists.
also: removed Adobe LiveCycle content as that application doesn’t exist any more.
Also: removed Adobe LiveCycle Designer content as that product no longer exists.
Also removed Livecycle content as that application is no longer being developed.
Also: removed Livecycle content
* fix incorrectly nested HTML * fix “image” tag typo * remove version number from Acrobat
* update screen grabs * update working docs
I don't know if you can do it at a folder level, but here's the pattern for pages:
So: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/update-pdf-techniques/techniques/pdf/PDF1.html Note: I added you and Mike as reviewers yesterday, but then found out that @ljoakley has one more file (PDF21) to work on, so I changed the PR back to a draft. That said, there's plenty of files before that to review before you get to that one. |
Which is why I asked! No need to preview the whole folder, so thanks very much for the GitHack syntax. This is a lot of work your are doing! Ping to @DuffJohnson in case he is curious to see where we hope PDFA might pick up. |
I do wish that we'd also updated these to be tool agnostic rather than updating vendors' products. Maybe when the forthcoming PDF Association documents get published it'll be a sensible time to re-visit the techniques. |
Thanks for the pointer; I've forwarded this to the PDF Accessibility LWG for review. |
@bruce-usab It's all done, so I've changed it to ready for review and assigned you. |
@awkawk FYI some updates to the PDF techniques. Willing to review? :) |
@mbgower arranged for Rob on my team to do so |
One note that jumps out is that Livecycle Designer wasn't EOL'd, it was renamed to Adobe AEM Designer. We can get an updated screenshot but the dialog is basically the same. See https://help.adobe.com/en_US/AEMForms/6.1/DesignerHelp/WS92d06802c76abadbe98a8d5129b8b01f08-7fd8.2.html for a reference. |
We agreed to merge these, but can take updates if Rob finds anything wrong. |
That's fine. For the future, if planning to approve a set of changes to 23 techniques on Tuesday, asking for review 4 days earlier (and over a weekend) is a little tight. Also note that the comment that I made 5 days ago was not attended to. |
This branch updates the PDF Techniques for the first time since approximately 2011.