-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional paragraph about compliance standards. #501
Conversation
Just a reminder for @awkawk to check with the privacy team about the examples. |
understanding/21/timeouts.html
Outdated
<p>This Success Criterion works in tandem with Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable, but is specifically focused on notification of timeouts related to user inactivity.</p> | ||
<p>The best way to conform to this success criterion is to keep the user data for at least 20 hours. This enables the user with disabilities and the aging community to start and finish a task, taking breaks as needed. However, when it is not practical to save the user data the author must warn the user about the duration of inactivity which will result in a timeout. Timeouts should be displayed to the user once at the beginning of the related task or process and not at each step.</p> | ||
<p>This success criterion only applies to timeouts that are within the content provider's knowledge or control. For example, if the user closes a web browser or device and loses content in an open page that has not yet been submitted, the success criterion has not been violated.</p> | ||
<p>Examples of privacy regulations mentioned in the success criterion note, and related compliance standards, are PCI (Payment Card Industry) and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996).</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor: do we title case "Success Criterion" here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason the information on line 17 wouldn't be put in the actual note itself?
Closes #421.
NB: It is one extra paragraph at the end of the intent, but I couldn't help myself evening-out the line-spacing for the paragraphs above that new one.