Success Criterion 1.4.14 Content on Hover or Focus #350
Comments
The criterion is specific to only be applicable "when additional content becomes visible" in order to mitigate any claim like that. This can certainly be emphasized in Understanding so I'll make a note to do so. |
you missed my what I was pointing out
The person points to something which causes additional content to become visible, thus triggering this SC. However the person can simply move the pointer off of that item and the visible content will disappear thus satisfying the SC. So there is actually nothing that the authors required to do, because a user can always move away from the item. Do you see what I mean? Am I missing something?
… On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Steve Repsher ***@***.***> wrote:
You could satisfy the " visible trigger" provision by simply saying that the user can move off of the element. I don't believe that is the intent
The criterion is specific to only be applicable "when additional content becomes visible" in order to mitigate any claim like that. This can certainly be emphasized in Understanding so I'll make a note to do so.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#350 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJph3oACQgr_AHyHVj7T0q6POSaSk-1Sks5sfu1ngaJpZM4PJrlD>.
|
I did see your point, but I thought the criterion had it covered. On second thought, I agree with you. This is an artifact of adding the ability to close the content later on as satisfactory, which was not in the original language. The closing mechanism is meant to be an action without moving focus or pointer as you said, such as a button or pressing ESC. Thanks for catching this. |
@GreggVan, pending working group approval of pull request #569, the proposed new language should address your issue. |
Looks good
… On Dec 6, 2017, at 3:55 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #350 <#350> via #569 <#569>.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#350 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJph3r1rclnZbfK3K1-FHeQxyJMWitLdks5s9gIFgaJpZM4PJrlD>.
|
==================================================================
issue
You could satisfy the " visible trigger" provision by simply saying that the user can move off of the element. I don't believe that is the intent
POTENTIAL SOLUTION
add " without moving the focus or hover off of the trigger "to the end so that it reads
Visible trigger
Either the additional content does not obscure any essential content within the triggering user interface component, or the additional content can be closed or repositioned by the user without moving the focus or hover off of the triggering user interface element.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: