WCAG2ICT Project: Make some global changes #18
Comments
|
NOTE: Could not change the following links in the 1.4.3 Understanding content because neither WCAG 2.1 nor WCAG 2.2 have working reference links for these documents. Opened WCAG issue 2756 to document these missing links from the WCAG understanding documents.
NOTE: Opened a new WCAG2ICT issue to track the addition /change of these references. |
|
Also having problems with some of the internal document definitions and the way the links work (or don't) when I try to move them to reference the github.io link address. For example this code does not work: While this code works: Same goes with references to "set of documents" using the cite tags. where the following format works, but doesn't use the cite code: |
|
Need to find out how to properly add WCAG 2.2 documents as citable references. Only WCAG 2.0 [WCAG20] shows up in the list of references. Need to be able to use the following 3 citations in the code: NOTE: This was moved to a new issue. |
|
Found out that there are two definitions of "content" in two different sections of the document. There are many references to each of them. Should this be consolidated into a single definition? Here are the two links: Need to see if the first link is used only in SC and wcag2ict content references and the second is only used from the Understanding content. |
|
If we look closely we will see that the second mention 7.3.7 content (Web content is only a placeholder to preserve the numbering — and points to the first one. So there is really only one.
Is that a problem?
gregg
…------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden
***@***.***
On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:21 AM, Mary Jo Mueller ***@***.***> wrote:
Found out that there are two definitions of "content" in two different sections of the document. There are many references to each of them. Should this be consolidated into a single definition? Here are the two links:
<a href="https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#content-on-and-off-the-web">Content</a>
<a href="https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#content-web-content">Content</a>
Need to see if these first link is used only in SC and wcag2ict content references and the second is only used from the Understanding content.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACNGDXRAAWCNIQCPH7CR4CDWF7W2NANCNFSM6AAAAAARONR5LY>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Found that these terms were missing the |
@GreggVan The problem is that multiple definitions of the same term caused build errors, so one had to be commented out. However, not all of the link references to the terms were going to the right one (either through my introduced error, or something leftover) so I had to do another sweep of the document to catch them all. All of these comments on this issue are mainly to myself to make sure I address all of these things before calling this issue done. |
|
Got it
All set
gregg
———————————
Professor, University of Maryland, College Park
Founder and Director Emeritus , Trace R&D Center, UMD
Co-Founder Raising the Floor. http://raisingthefloor.org
The Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII) http://GPII.net
The Morphic project https://morphic.org
… On Oct 31, 2022, at 12:07 PM, Mary Jo Mueller ***@***.***> wrote:
If we look closely we will see that the second mention 7.3.7 content (Web content is only a placeholder to preserve the numbering — and points to the first one. So there is really only one. Is that a problem? gregg
… <x-msg://53/#>
------------------------------ Gregg Vanderheiden @.***
On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:21 AM, Mary Jo Mueller @.***> wrote: Found out that there are two definitions of "content" in two different sections of the document. There are many references to each of them. Should this be consolidated into a single definition? Here are the two links: Content</a](https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#content-on-and-off-the-web%22>Content <https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#content-on-and-off-the-web%22%3EContent></a)> Content</a](https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#content-web-content%22>Content <https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#content-web-content%22%3EContent></a)> Need to see if these first link is used only in SC and wcag2ict content references and the second is only used from the Understanding content. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (comment) <#18 (comment)>>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACNGDXRAAWCNIQCPH7CR4CDWF7W2NANCNFSM6AAAAAARONR5LY. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
@GreggVan <https://github.com/GreggVan> The problem is that multiple definitions of the same term caused build errors, so one had to be commented out. However, not all of the link references to the terms were going to the right one (either through my introduced error, or something leftover) so I had to do another sweep of the document to catch them all. All of these comments on this issue are mainly to myself to make sure I address all of these things before calling this issue done.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACNGDXT6AEIW65Q6GRQLSD3WGAKFVANCNFSM6AAAAAARONR5LY>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
|
Plan to use this issue to sweep the whole document for formatting and link changes, once we've got the includes, headings and document formatting settled. |
|
I think these things are handled now. If something crops up, we can open a new issue. |
Status of this Document
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: