Proposed improvements on the terminology section of the model

[iherman]

I have tried to improve the wording of the Terminology section, surfacing each terms to the top and also making the description of classes (hopefully) a bit clearer (took over some terminology from the RDF Schema specification).

I have also used the respec tools to have definitions and an (easy) way to refer to the definition. It may be useful to put such references into the text (a bit tedious but should be doable with a good text editor...)

[azaroth42]

Not sure about adding SpecificResource here, especially given the discussion around #110? Will copy the details out (as they need to go into the template rather than index-respec directly.
[Edit: I see Property moved...]

[azaroth42]

I've copied over the vast majority:
http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#terminology

Other than the bits I commented on above.
Thanks Ivan!

[iherman]

Great.

A minor issue that may (but hopefully will not!) come up we will ever use OWL to express things. Indeed, in that case a class MAY be a blank node (defined through OWL expressions) which would complicate things: a class may be 'just' a resource, not necessarily a web resource. But, at the moment, this is irrelevant and, hopefully, it will stay so… Just flagging this for our own memory.

On 26 Feb 2016, at 20:27, Rob Sanderson notifications@github.com wrote:

I've copied over the vast majority:
http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#terminology http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#terminology
Other than the bits I commented on above.
Thanks Ivan!

[azaroth42]

Closing, as the content is in the draft now. Thanks again, Ivan!